![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Feynman...what a guy...
Aug. 28th, 2010 09:42 pmToday's sticky keys: Enter and the apostrophe
I am beginning to think that one ought to use the lectures of Richard Feynman for the purposes of bibliomancy (I nearly typed bilbiomancy then which is quite another thing and probably illegal given they are an endangered species), rather than the usual tome. I came across the following the other day which
seemed so apposite to the current state of the country that I couldn't resist sharing it. It's longish, but bear with me. I also apologise for the unenclusive language, but this was written in 1963.
Suppose two politicians are running for president, and one goes through the farm section and is asked, "What are you going to do about the farm question?" And he knows right away - bang, bang, bang. Now he goes to the next campaigner who comes through. " What are you going to do about the farm problem?" 'Well, I don't know. I used to be a general, and I don't know anything about farming. But it seems to me that it must be a very difficult problem, because for twwelve, fifteen, twenty years people have been struggling with it, and people say that they know how to solve the farm problem. And it must be a hard problem. So the wey I intend to solve the farm problem is to gather around me a lot of people who know something about it, to look at all the experience that we have had with this problem before, to take a certain amount of time at it, and then to come to some conclusion in a reasonable way about it. Now I can't tell you ahead of time what conclusion, but I can give you some of the principles I'll try to use - not to make things difficult for individual farmers, if there are any special problems we will have to have some way to take care of them," etc, etc, etc.
Now such a man would never get anywhere in this country, I think. It's never been tried, anyway. This is in the attitude of mind of the populace, that they have to have an answer, and that a man who gives an answer is better than a man who gives no answer, when the real fact of the matter is, in most cases, it is the other way around. And the result of this of course is that the politician must give an answer. And the result of this is that political promises can never be kept. It is a mechanical fact; it is impossible. And the result of that is a general disparaging of politics, a general lack of respect for the people who are trying to solve problems, and so forth.
I am beginning to think that one ought to use the lectures of Richard Feynman for the purposes of bibliomancy (I nearly typed bilbiomancy then which is quite another thing and probably illegal given they are an endangered species), rather than the usual tome. I came across the following the other day which
seemed so apposite to the current state of the country that I couldn't resist sharing it. It's longish, but bear with me. I also apologise for the unenclusive language, but this was written in 1963.
Suppose two politicians are running for president, and one goes through the farm section and is asked, "What are you going to do about the farm question?" And he knows right away - bang, bang, bang. Now he goes to the next campaigner who comes through. " What are you going to do about the farm problem?" 'Well, I don't know. I used to be a general, and I don't know anything about farming. But it seems to me that it must be a very difficult problem, because for twwelve, fifteen, twenty years people have been struggling with it, and people say that they know how to solve the farm problem. And it must be a hard problem. So the wey I intend to solve the farm problem is to gather around me a lot of people who know something about it, to look at all the experience that we have had with this problem before, to take a certain amount of time at it, and then to come to some conclusion in a reasonable way about it. Now I can't tell you ahead of time what conclusion, but I can give you some of the principles I'll try to use - not to make things difficult for individual farmers, if there are any special problems we will have to have some way to take care of them," etc, etc, etc.
Now such a man would never get anywhere in this country, I think. It's never been tried, anyway. This is in the attitude of mind of the populace, that they have to have an answer, and that a man who gives an answer is better than a man who gives no answer, when the real fact of the matter is, in most cases, it is the other way around. And the result of this of course is that the politician must give an answer. And the result of this is that political promises can never be kept. It is a mechanical fact; it is impossible. And the result of that is a general disparaging of politics, a general lack of respect for the people who are trying to solve problems, and so forth.
